|
Studies Look for Reasons Behind
Racial Disparities in Health Care,
Christopher Lee
, Washington Post,
Staff Writer ,
Wednesday, October 25, 2006; A10
Racial minorities are less likely to
undergo major surgeries at the hospitals where those operations are
done best, and black patients at Medicare HMOs fare worse than
whites on several health measures regardless of plan quality,
according to studies being released today.
The two studies in today's issue of
the Journal of the American Medical Association, plus a third
showing that black women are less likely than their white
counterparts to survive breast cancer, add to the voluminous
evidence that the
U.S. health-care system works differently for minorities than for
whites despite years of efforts to erase racial disparities.
Studies have demonstrated that blacks
and other minorities are far less likely than whites to receive many
types of care, such as appendectomies, heart bypass surgery, or
basic tests and drugs for heart disease and diabetes. Minorities on
average are more prone to illness, have more complications and
recover more slowly. They also are more likely to die from their
illnesses, and to die younger.
But while the persistent disparities
are well-documented, the causes remain the focus of research and
debate. One explanation is that minorities tend to be poorer and
less educated, with less access to care. And they tend to live in
places where doctors and hospitals provide lower quality care than
elsewhere. Others suspect cultural or biological differences play a
role, and there is a long-running debate about whether subtle racism
infects the health-care system.
Major medical organizations, private
foundations and government health agencies have begun a host of
studies, programs and initiatives in the past decade to try to close
the gap.
In one new study, researchers at the
UCLA medical school studied 719,608 patients who underwent one of 10
major operations -- including knee replacement, heart bypass and
lung cancer surgeries -- over a five-year period.
They found that blacks, Hispanics and
Asians were less likely than whites to receive care at hospitals
that perform a high volume of the surgeries and excel in them.
Minority patients were more likely to have their operations at
low-volume hospitals, where mortality rates tend to be higher. The
same was true for uninsured and Medicaid patients, who are
disproportionately minorities.
"The current study demonstrates a
significant disparity in the distribution of patients at high- and
low-volume hospitals with respect to race/ethnicity and insurance
status," the authors wrote.
The racial disparities remained even
after accounting for income, age and how close a person lived to
high- and low-volume hospitals. The researchers suggest that
inadequate transportation or the lack of knowledge among minorities
about hospital quality could be factors. Minorities are
underrepresented among surgeons, and physicians who care for black
patients are less likely to be board certified in a specialty and
may have a harder time getting access to the better hospitals for
their patients.
"Everyone wants to improve quality,
but it's difficult," said Clifford Y. Ko, a co-author and professor
of surgery at UCLA. "Not everyone can go to these high-volume
places. . . . I personally think that instead of identifying one out
of however many hospitals that people should go to that might have
good outcomes, we should try to improve care at all hospitals."
A second study, led by Amal N. Trivedi,
assistant professor of community health at Brown University, found
that blacks do worse than whites in controlling blood pressure,
blood sugar and cholesterol levels despite quality improvements at
Medicare HMOs that have succeeded in shrinking gaps in care received
by minorities and whites. The study, which looked at more than
430,000 patients in 151 plans, found that the disparity existed in
both high- and low-quality Medicare HMOs -- undercutting the theory
that blacks fare worse because they receive their care from lower
quality providers.
"Across the board, black enrollees
have lower performance on these measures," Trivedi said in an
interview. "And the gaps were wide. . . . Even high-quality plans do
not provide effective medical treatment for all of their patients."
Health plans should examine whether
black patients lack access to medication or cannot afford it,
because drugs can be effective in controlling conditions such as
high cholesterol, blood pressure and blood sugar, Trivedi said. It
also is worth trying to figure out whether black enrollees tend to
get their care from lower-quality physicians within plans, he said.
"We can't say specifically why the
gaps exist in each plan," Trivedi said. "It's probably a shared
responsibility of plans, providers and patients. There's probably
not one factor that explains all of the disparity, but health plans
do play an important role."
In the breast cancer study, published
online Monday in the journal Cancer, researchers from the University
of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston examined 2,140
patients who took part in clinical trails at the cancer center from
1975 to 2000. They found that black women had lower survival rates
than white and Hispanic women, and that black patients had more
advanced cancer at the time of treatment.
Previous studies with similar results
have concluded that less frequent screening, less aggressive
treatment and different access to care may be factors in lower
survival rates for black women. But because all women in the new
study received the same treatment, researchers think that breast
cancer tumors may be more aggressive and less responsive to
treatment in black women.
"These findings should prompt
additional research on how we can improve outcomes for African
American patients by understanding and addressing tumor biology,"
said Wendy Woodward, an assistant professor of radiation oncology at
the cancer center and lead author of the study.
© 2006 The
Washington Post Company
|